The Obama administration wants to more quickly reunite
Americans with their illegal immigrant spouses and children in a move long
sought by advocates but panned by Republicans as a way to push unpopular
policies around Congress. Many North Carolina Immigration Lawyer advocates are paying attention.
Currently, many illegal immigrants must leave the country
before they can ask the federal government to waive a three- to 10-year ban on
legally coming back to the U.S. The length of the ban depends on how long they
have lived in the U.S. without permission.
On Friday, the Obama administration proposed changing the
rule to let children and spouses ask the government to decide on the waiver
request before they head to their home country to seek a visa to return here
legally.
The illegal immigrants would still have to go abroad to
finish the visa process, but getting a provisional waiver approved in advance
would reduce the time they are out of the country from months to days or weeks,
said Alejandro Mayorkas, director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
The purpose is "to minimize the extent to which
bureaucratic delays separate Americans from their families for long periods of time,"
Mayorkas told reporters.
It currently takes about six months for the government to
issue a waiver, Mayorkas said.
The waiver shift is the latest move by President Barack
Obama to make changes to immigration policy without congressional action.
Congressional Republicans repeatedly have criticized the administration for
policy changes they describe as providing "backdoor amnesty" to
illegal immigrants.
The proposal also comes as Obama gears up for a re-election
contest in which the support of Hispanic voters could prove a determining
factor in a number of states. The administration hopes to change the rule later
this year after taking public comments. Many North Carolina Immigration Lawyer advocates are paying attention.
Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, on Friday accused the president
of putting the interests of illegal immigrants ahead of those of Americans.
"It seems President Obama plays by his own rules to
push unpopular policies on the American people," the House Judiciary Committee
chair said in a statement.
Immigrants who do not have criminal records and who have
only violated immigration laws can win a waiver if they can prove their absence
would cause an extreme hardship for their American spouse or parent. The
government received about 23,000 hardship applications in 2011 and more than 70
percent were approved.
About 75 percent of the applications were filed by Mexicans,
according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
Immigrant advocates have long complained about the current
system, which can split up families for months or years. And since there's no
guarantee a person will win a waiver to return, many immigrant families refuse
to take the risk of going abroad to apply for one.
Laura Barajas, a 42-year-old stay-at-home mom in Orange
County, is due to travel to Ciudad Juarez in two weeks to try to get her
papers. She and her U.S. citizen husband are trying to stay positive, but she
is afraid to leave him and their two young children behind.
"I don't want to be separated for a long time from my
children," said Barajas, who came to the U.S. illegally to find work, then
met her future husband and stayed. "I'm not going to risk taking them to a
place that I don't even know after 18 years."
Pro-immigration activists and lawyers embraced the change,
saying it would keep families together and encourage more people now in the
United States illegally to emerge from the shadows and apply for visas. Some
said it could even save lives.
Rep. Jared Polis, D-Colo., recalled the case of Tania Nava
Palacios, who went to Ciudad Juarez -- a hotbed for drug-fueled violence --
with her American husband and son in pursuit of a waiver. Drug cartel members
killed her husband last year, his office said in a statement.
Kelly Alfaro, of Washington state, said her husband,
Guillermo, waited in Mexico for eight months last year after he had his visa
interview in Ciudad Juarez.
"I was terrified for his safety because I know how
dangerous it is there and I had no way of knowing how long he would have to
stay in Mexico," she said.
Democratic lawmakers welcomed the Obama administration's
move to change the immigration system by rulemaking after efforts at a
legislative overhaul failed.
"Has it taken a while? Yes. Is it happening? Yes,"
said Rep. Luis Gutierrez, D-Ill., who has encouraged such changes. "Am I
looking forward to telling people to vote for him? Absolutely."
Immigration has become a difficult issue for Obama ahead of
the November election. As a presidential candidate, he pledged to change what
many consider to be a broken immigration system.
To that end, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano
announced plans last year to review some 300,000 pending deportation cases in
an effort to target criminal illegal immigrants, repeat immigration law
violators and those who pose a national security or public safety threat.
Napolitano said the DHS would delay indefinitely the cases
of many illegal immigrants who have no criminal record and those who have been
arrested for only minor traffic violations or other misdemeanors. A pilot
program is under way to begin reviewing the case. A North Carolina Immigration Attorney is investigating the idea as well.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement Director John Morton
also issued a memo in June outlining how immigration authorities could use
discretion in deciding which illegal immigrants to arrest and put into
deportation proceedings.
Congressional Republicans have decried the policy changes,
arguing that the Obama administration is circumventing Congress.
Several attempts at an immigration law overhaul have failed
in recent years, including the so-called DREAM Act, which would have allowed
for some young illegal immigrants brought to the U.S. as children to earn legal
status if they went to college or joined the military.
No comments:
Post a Comment