NOT SO FAST: SPECIAL MASTER FINDS FISHERMAN FRAUDSTER CAUGHT IN HIS OWN NET OF LIES

Original Story: thestateofthegulf.com

The Special Master tasked with investigating the Deepwater Horizon settlement process filed a motion this week urging the District Court to order the return of fraudulent payments made to Gill Johnson, Sr., who received over $440,000 from the Deepwater Horizon Economic Claims Center (“DHECC”).  The motion alleges that Johnson’s claims were based on falsified tax returns that were never even filed with the IRS.

In his motion, the Special Master informed the Court that in January 2013, Johnson filed claims seeking compensation for losses associated with his commercial fishing business based on his 2008 and 2009 tax records.  The rub?  Johnson didn’t file or pay taxes with the IRS in either of those years.

The 2008 tax return Johnson provided to the claims facility was undated and unsigned – and false, according to the Special Master’s motion.  The claims facility accepted his return despite the fact that the Settlement Agreement specifically requires claimants to file signed tax returns with their claims.  And the motion also stated that the 2009 tax record he provided to support his claims was prepared in July of 2010 for the sole purpose of allowing Johnson to file his Deepwater Horizon claim.  Johnson, the motion explains, allegedly based his 2009 return not on any source documents, but rather on a verbal summary given by Johnson’s girlfriend to the tax preparer Johnson had hired.

The claims facility accepted Johnson’s misrepresentations and his falsified forms, and awarded him over $440,000.  For their efforts in helping Johnson prepare his claim, his attorneys received over $109,000 – fees that the law firm returned the very same day that the Special Master filed his motion.

This motion, like others filed by the Special Master, underscores a simple fact: settlement funds paid for improper claims should be repaid.  Restitution is important in cases like this, not only so that fraudsters don’t benefit from their fraudulent acts, but also “to safeguard the integrity of an important public institution administering a fund for the benefit of an injured segment of society.”  In addition, the Special Master also urges the Court to enforce a one strike, you’re out policy with regards to Johnson, arguing that allowing claimants who have filed fraudulent claims the opportunity to resubmit their claims using different documentation would only encourage them to take a chance on fraud – knowing that they could submit different data if they got caught.

Of course, this is exactly what the PSC's lead lawyer appears to want: in a recent letter to Judge Freeh and the Court, Steve Herman argues that when fraud is alleged or suspected, the claimant should be notified that the "claim might be fraudulent" and given a chance to withdraw the Claim or otherwise attempt to explain it.  Unfortunately, this process would have the effect of giving unscrupulous claimants a risk-free chance to get their fraudulent claims paid.  In the world he appears to be urging, there's no apparent downside to taking your best shot at free money.  Such attempts at fraud would not be treated so leniently anywhere else in the world - not by employers, not by merchants, and definitely not by the IRS.  The policy at a court-supervised claims facility should reflect that attempts to commit fraud will not be tolerated.

Fraudsters should take note: BP certainly did not agree to pay for claims tainted by fraud or corruption.  The Special Master’s latest motion sends a clear message that attempts to take advantage of the settlement process are being investigated, and that those caught red-handed should expect to answer for their fraud.

Former BP Engineer Deleted Evidence

Story first appeared in The Wall Street Journal.

A former engineer for BP has been arrested and accused of deleting text messages detailing how much oil was gushing into the Gulf of Mexico as BP tried to staunch the Deepwater Horizon spill in the spring of 2010.

The former engineer is charged with two counts of obstructing justice for deleting from his iPhone hundreds of text messages he exchanged with a co-worker and a contractor, according to a criminal complaint unsealed Tuesday.

The complaint represents the first criminal charges brought against any workers involved in the accident or its aftermath.

BP said in a statement it wouldn't comment on the charges against the former employee but that the company had clear policies requiring preservation of evidence in the case. The company said it was cooperating with the Department of Justice and other official investigations into the Deepwater Horizon accident and oil spill.

The engineer was part of an internal team BP set up to estimate the amount of oil leaking from the well as well as to try to stop the leak.

BP sent numerous notices requiring him to save all information concerning the well, including his text messages, according to the complaint, but he allegedly deleted about 200 text messages in October 2010 and 100 other messages in August 2011.

The deleted messages, some of which were recovered forensically, included sensitive information about the failure of one of the efforts to stop the flow of oil, known as the "top kill." This includes a May 26, 2010, message from the first day of the top-kill efforts that said, "Too much flowrate—over 15,000," indicating the flow from the well was three times higher than the company had said was the official rate of flow.


For more law related news, visit the Nation of Law blog.
For national and worldwide related business news, visit the Peak News Room blog.
For local and Michigan business related news, visit the Michigan Business News blog.
For healthcare and medical related news, visit the Healthcare and Medical blog.
For real estate and home related news, visit the  Commercial and Residential Real Estate blog.
For technology and electronics related news, visit the Electronics America blog.
For organic SEO and web optimization related news, visit the SEO Done Right blog.